Who Benefits from the Debate about the Assassination of (insert X)?
Cancel policy and murder have become an integral part of the political debate in many Western countries. That only means they are catching up with what has been the case in other places for decades: shutting up people with different opinions. There are few who look for real solutions. It seems the biggest chunk of the debate is about whose fault it is. What we should ask is: who benefits and possibly most importantly what are our common interests as voters? The Familiar Pattern The murder of Charlie Kirk followed the established pattern: outrage (some of it real), thoughts and prayers sent to his family and friends (some of them real) followed by the wait for another gun shot. Not another assassination but the starter gun for the obligatory mud-slinging. The culprit (this time) is the left. When the two Democratic Minnesota state politicians were murdered in June it was the right. So, technically 50% of the population in either case. There is the added hand wringing in non-U.S. media a...